SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF call-prep

Prepare for a customer or prospect call using Common Room signals. Triggers on 'prep me for my call with [company]', 'prepare for a meeting with [company]', 'what should I know before talking to [company]', or any call preparation request.

w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills Agent Skills author: w95 MIT 2 files body ≈ 1 399 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Prepare for a customer or prospect call using Common Room signals.

As a process F 42/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/my-company-context.md

ProcedureSales and CRMPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
42/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/my-company-context.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/my-company-context.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 42/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/my-company-context.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/my-company-context.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (call-prep) differs from the folder (call-prep-common-room)
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1399 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 239: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.