SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD citation-crosscheck

Double-blind bibliographic cross-check: one agent extracts each cited entry verbatim from the local .bib, a second independently re-fetches the same paper's record from the web while blind to the .bib, and a third extractor emits a mechanical field-by-field delta to catch dropped/re-ordered authors, wrong years, wrong venues, and bad DOIs/arXiv ids. The main agent (never a shard) assigns the MATCH/MINOR/MISMATCH verdict per reference, and exports a side-by-side spreadsheet. Use when user says "citation crosscheck", "double-blind citation check", "verify bib against scholar", "bib field audit", "引用交叉核对", or before submission when bibliography FIELD accuracy (not just existence) must be certified.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep Claude Code author: wanshuiyin 2 files · 1 script body ≈ 8 870 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Double-blind bibliographic cross-check: one agent extracts each cited entry verbatim from the local .bib, a second independently re-fetches the same paper's…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/external-cadence.md, ../shared-references/fan-out-pattern.md, ../shared-references/acceptance-gate.md

ProcedureExcelLaTeXResearchAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/external-cadence.md, ../shared-references/fan-out-pattern.md, ../shared-references/acceptance-gate.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash(*)
    allowed-tools: Bash(*) Read Grep Glob Write Agent WebFetch WebSearch

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 8870 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/external-cadence.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/fan-out-pattern.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/acceptance-gate.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/integration-contract.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 369): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/external-cadence.md, ../shared-references/fan-out-pattern.md, ../shared-references/acceptance-gate.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../shared-references/external-cadence.md, ../shared-references/fan-out-pattern.md, ../shared-references/acceptance-gate.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 8870 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 85Steps. 23 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 704: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.