SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC experiment-plan

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep Agent Skills author: wanshuiyin MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 296 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../shared-references/output-manifest.md, ../shared-references/output-language.md

ProcedureAI and agentsOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../shared-references/output-manifest.md, ../shared-references/output-language.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: experiment-plan (Lord1Egypt/RA-Skills)

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash(*)
    allowed-tools: Bash(*) Read Write Edit Grep Glob WebSearch WebFetch

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/output-versioning.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/output-manifest.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/output-language.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../shared-references/output-manifest.md, ../shared-references/output-language.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../shared-references/output-manifest.md, ../shared-references/output-language.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 60 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2296 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 379: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.