SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD meta-apply

Privileged applier that LANDS meta-optimize / corpus-audit patches the user approved — the ONLY skill permitted to mutate the skill corpus from a self-modification proposal, with cross-model jury and human approval at landing. Use when the user says "meta apply", "/meta-apply", "land the staged patches", "应用优化", after a /meta-optimize run.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep Claude Code author: wanshuiyin MIT 1 file body ≈ 2 029 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 h ago

Privileged applier that LANDS meta-optimize / corpus-audit patches the user approved — the ONLY skill permitted to mutate the skill corpus from a…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../meta-optimize/SKILL.md, ../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../meta-optimize/SKILL.md, ../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash(*)
    allowed-tools: Bash(*) Read Write Edit Grep Glob mcp__codex__codex mcp__codex__codex-reply mcp__antigravity__antigravity mcp__antigravity__antigravity-reply mcp__grok__grok mcp__grok__grok-reply mcp__

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../meta-optimize/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/review-scope-limits.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/integration-contract.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/review-tracing.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../meta-optimize/SKILL.md, ../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md
  • 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../meta-optimize/SKILL.md, ../shared-references/reviewer-independence.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2029 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 341: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.