BC experiment-bridge
Workflow 1.5: Bridge between idea discovery and auto review. Reads EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md, implements experiment code, deploys to GPU, collects initial results. Use when user says "实现实验", "implement experiments", "bridge", "从计划到跑实验", "deploy the plan", or has an experiment plan ready to execute.
Workflow 1.5: Bridge between idea discovery and auto review. Reads EXPERIMENTPLAN.md, implements experiment code, deploys to GPU, collects initial results.…
As a process C 65/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../shared-references/external-cadence.md, ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md
The same skill appears in 1 more place: Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../shared-references/external-cadence.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../shared-references/output-manifest.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../shared-references/output-language.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: templates/RESEARCH_CONTRACT_TEMPLATE.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../shared-references/external-cadence.md, ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4285 tokens
- 85Steps. 68 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 292: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.