SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC paper-plan

Generate a structured paper outline from review conclusions and experiment results. Use when user says \"写大纲\", \"paper outline\", \"plan the paper\", \"论文规划\", or wants to create a paper plan before writing.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep Agent Skills author: wanshuiyin MIT 1 file body ≈ 3 253 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 h ago

Generate a structured paper outline from review conclusions and experiment results.

As a process C 66/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../../shared-references/output-manifest.md

AnalyzerGitHubResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
66/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../../shared-references/output-manifest.md
Tools and files w 18
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared-references/output-manifest.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../shared-references/output-language.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../../shared-references/output-manifest.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../shared-references/reviewer-backends.md, ../../shared-references/output-versioning.md, ../../shared-references/output-manifest.md
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 37 steps
  • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3253 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 208: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.