SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC layout-library-importer

Add a supplied layout image and bilingual layout prompt to the local handdraw-style layout library and gallery. Use for new SC-* social-card or IG-* infographic layouts; do not use for style-number imports.

yang0/handraw-style Agent Skills author: yang0 2 files body ≈ 1 392 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 h ago

Add a supplied layout image and bilingual layout prompt to the local handdraw-style layout library and gallery.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: references/layouts.json, references/layouts/{ID}.md

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
References files that are not bundled: references/layouts.json, references/layouts/{ID}.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/layouts.json
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/layouts/{ID}.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 56): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/layouts.json, references/layouts/{ID}.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/layouts.json, references/layouts/{ID}.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 10 steps
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1392 tokens
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 206: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.