SKILLEMALL.ai

CD popular-web-designs

54 real-world design systems (Stripe, Linear, Vercel, Notion, Apple…) as ready-to-paste HTML/CSS — exact colors, typography, components, and spacing for styling a page after a known brand.

yc-software/qm Agent Skills author: yc-software MIT 55 files body ≈ 2 866 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

54 real-world design systems (Stripe, Linear, Vercel, Notion, Apple…) as ready-to-paste HTML/CSS — exact colors, typography, components, and spacing for…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureStripeNotionMongoDBSupabaseDesignMarketingInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token templates/hashicorp.md:91
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    - **Primary Brand**: `__ha…0ca` (HashiCorp Sans), with fallback: `__ha…0ca`
    quoted

Files scanned: 55. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, write, web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2866 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 188: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.