SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CC story-long-analyze

长篇网文拆文。保留黄金三章、逐章摘要、剧情、情绪、节奏、角色、设定和文风接口，以连续章节块完成因果、双时间线、关系与三维节奏分析；兼容旧成果直接使用、按需增强和断点续跑。含可选三层灵感库管道（灵感库、跨书灵感聚合、更新灵感库）。触发方式：/story-long-analyze、/长篇拆文、「帮我拆这本书」「拆这本书」「分析黄金三章」「深度拆解」「完整拆解」或提供小说文本文件路径。

zenstory-ai/oh-story-claudecode Agent Skills author: zenstory-ai MIT 18 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 1 445 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

长篇网文拆文。保留黄金三章、逐章摘要、剧情、情绪、节奏、角色、设定和文风接口，以连续章节块完成因果、双时间线、关系与三维节奏分析；兼容旧成果直接使用、按需增强和断点续跑。含可选三层灵感库管道（灵感库、跨书灵感聚合、更新灵感库）。触发方式：/story-long-analyze、/长篇拆文、「帮我拆这本书」「拆这本书」…

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 72): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1445 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -33 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 191: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (12 of 12)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.