CF video-understanding
把视频分析为结构化理解索引：场景检测、ASR 转写、逐场景 VLM 观察、静音窗口、融合时间线和写作 brief。 用于理解、索引或总结视频，也作为后续创作前的分析阶段。输入视频文件；输出 scenes.json、 asr_result.json、vlm_analysis.json、silence_periods.json、timeline_fusion.json、agent_narration_brief.md。 触发词：视频理解、视频分析、视频索引、video understanding、analyze video、看懂视频。
把视频分析为结构化理解索引：场景检测、ASR 转写、逐场景 VLM 观察、静音窗口、融合时间线和写作 brief。 用于理解、索引或总结视频，也作为后续创作前的分析阶段。输入视频文件；输出 scenes.json、…
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/...
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyscripts/lib.py:104Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
Files scanned: 28. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/...
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/...
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 15 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 540 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -318 of 19 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 268: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.