SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC feature-matrix-parity

Update the OpenClaw and Hermes comparison columns of the ZeroClaw feature-and-support matrix. Use this skill when the user wants to refresh, fill, or verify parity data in docs/book/feature-matrix-parity.toml, add a new comparison row or section to the feature matrix, or re-walk the competitor repos for support status. Trigger on: 'update the feature matrix', 'refresh parity', 'fill the parity TOML', 'walk OpenClaw and Hermes', 'the matrix shows Unknown', 're-verify the comparison columns', 'add a row to the feature matrix'.

zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw Agent Skills author: zeroclaw-labs Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 2 362 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Update the OpenClaw and Hermes comparison columns of the ZeroClaw feature-and-support matrix.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureGitHubSoftware developmentAI and agentsOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 21 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2362 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 530: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.