BC competition-zip-archive
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for ZIP and PKZIP archive challenges, legacy ZipCrypto identification, known-plaintext recovery with bkcrack, key-based decryption, and reproducible extraction. Use when the user asks to solve an encrypted ZIP challenge, inspect ZipCrypto metadata, recover keys from a known file prefix, or unlock an archive without starting with password brute force. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:28Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (documentation of a security skill)powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skills/scripts/refr…ps1
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:29Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (documentation of a security skill)powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skills/scripts/boot…ps1 -Capability bkcrack
security skill
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 6, 14): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1312 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 533: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.