CD patch-diff-exploit
N-day 补丁差分到利用。从厂商发布的补丁里反推漏洞点、写 PoC、做成可用的攻击模块。 适用场景:已知 CVE 编号但只有补丁没有 PoC、SRC/红队需要打击未及时更新的资产、N-day 武器化、Patch Tuesday 跟进。 核心方法:拿 before/after 二进制 → 对齐符号 → 二进制 diff → 看新增的安全检查反推 bug class → 写 PoC 触发漏洞。 触发关键词:N-day、Nday、补丁差分、patch diff、patch tuesday、1day、binary diff 漏洞、bindiff 利用、ghidriff、Diaphora、补丁分析、CVE 复现、漏洞还原、补丁反推、N-day 武器化。
N-day 补丁差分到利用。从厂商发布的补丁里反推漏洞点、写 PoC、做成可用的攻击模块。 适用场景:已知 CVE 编号但只有补丁没有 PoC、SRC/红队需要打击未及时更新的资产、N-day 武器化、Patch Tuesday 跟进。 核心方法:拿 before/after 二进制 → 对齐符号 → 二进制…
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:37Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (documentation table row)| 把 1-day 武器化部署到目标网络 | `pentest-tools/network-attack-defense/` |
table -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:200Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **法律边界** — 武器化 N-day 必须在授权范围内(SRC / Bug Bounty / 自有靶机 / CTF)。对生产环境直接打 1-day 等同入侵
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:231Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (documentation of a security skill)powershell -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File "<SKILL_ROOT>\skills\scripts\boot…ps1" -Capability @('bindiff','ghidriff','ghidra','wsuspect-proxy') -StartServicessecurity skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:250Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- `pentest-tools/network-attack-defense/` — 把 N-day 武器化部署到目标网络(包装成可投递载荷、对接 C2)
quoted
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2018 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 326: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.