Skill rating
46 skills. The A–F grade combines safety (60%) and quality (40%); tests add a bonus. The rating refreshes automatically from open catalogs.
ManufacturingLogistics and warehouseProcurementQuality controlContact centreField serviceFinanceCustomer supportindustry shortcuts
| # | Grade | Skill | Score ▾ | Safety | Quality | Process | Tests | Popularity | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B | This skill should be used when need prioritize what changed code in repository human must review. | 100 | 84 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 2 | B | load-pr-commentsAnalyzerGitHubAI and agentsData and analyticsNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Use to load open/unresolved PR review comments then aggregate them as tasks in .specs/comments/*.md for parallel agents to fix. | 100 | 84 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 3 | B | Add missing test coverage for your local code changes by generating new test files (covers uncommitted and untracked changes, or the latest commit if everything is committed). Use when you want write | 100 | 84 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 4 | B | Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental | 100 | 84 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 5 | B | Review your local uncommitted working-tree changes (git diff plus untracked files) and return actionable improvement suggestions. Use before committing, when nothing has been pushed yet. | 100 | 82 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 6 | B | Review an existing GitHub pull request and post inline review comments on its diff. Use when the changes are on an opened PR rather than your local working tree. | 100 | 79 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 7 | B | Auto-selects best Kaizen method (Gemba Walk, Value Stream, or Muda) for target | 100 | 81 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 8 | B | design-testing-strategyGeneratorPostgreSQLPlaywrightSoftware developmentNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Use before writing any type of tests. Distills 14 industry sources into deterministic decision gates, schemas, and worked test examples. | 100 | 77 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 9 | B | Execute one complex task as ordered, dependent steps run sequentially, passing context from each step to the next, with per-step LLM-as-a-judge verification. Use when later steps depend on the results | 100 | 77 | B | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 10 | B | Run independent tasks concurrently across multiple files or targets using parallel sub-agents, with per-task model selection and LLM-as-a-judge verification. Use when tasks do not depend on each other | 100 | 74 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 11 | B | test-coverageAnalyzerGitHubSoftware developmentData and analyticsNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Use after writing tests to assess coverage quality across structural, mutation, requirements, and API/integration dimensions; organized knowledge for choosing and interpreting coverage analyses. | 100 | 74 | B | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 12 | B | Comprehensive guide for creating Claude Code agents with proper structure, triggering conditions, system prompts, and validation - combines official Anthropic best practices with proven patterns | 100 | 75 | B | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 13 | C | resolve-fixed-pr-commentsAnalyzerGitHubAI and agentsSoftware developmentNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Verify what PR review comments have been addressed (committed/pushed OR uncommitted local changes) and resolve the threads that are genuinely fixed or no longer relevant. | 100 | 72 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 14 | C | Launch an intelligent sub-agent with automatic model selection based on task complexity, specialized agent matching, Zero-shot CoT reasoning, and mandatory self-critique verification | 100 | 72 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 15 | C | Curates insights from reflections and critiques into CLAUDE.md using Agentic Context Engineering | 100 | 72 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 16 | C | Interactive assistant for creating new Claude commands with proper structure, patterns, and MCP tool integration | 100 | 69 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 17 | C | Create a workflow command that orchestrates multi-step execution through sub-agents with file-based task prompts | 100 | 69 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 18 | C | Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 19 | C | Guide for setup Context7 MCP server to load documentation for specific technologies. | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 20 | C | Evaluate solutions through multi-round debate between independent judges until consensus | 100 | 69 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 21 | C | Iterative PDCA cycle for systematic experimentation and continuous improvement | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 22 | C | Guide for setup Codemap CLI for intelligent codebase visualization and navigation | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 23 | C | cause-and-effectAnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructureNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Systematic Fishbone analysis exploring problem causes across six categories | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 24 | C | setup-serena-mcpProcedureGitHubAI and agentsSoftware developmentNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Guide for setup Serena MCP server for semantic code retrieval and editing capabilities | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 25 | C | Guide for setup arXiv paper search MCP server using Docker MCP | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 26 | C | Analyze a GitHub issue and create a detailed technical specification | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 27 | C | Systematically fix all failing tests after business logic changes or refactoring | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 28 | C | Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building | 100 | 69 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 29 | C | Launch a meta-judge then a judge sub-agent to evaluate results produced in the current conversation | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 30 | C | Iterative Five Whys root cause analysis drilling from symptoms to fundamentals | 100 | 69 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 31 | C | Create well-formatted commits with conventional commit messages and emoji | 100 | 67 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 32 | C | Load all open issues from GitHub and save them as markdown files | 100 | 65 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 33 | C | creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent | 100 | 64 | B | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 34 | C | Execute tasks through competitive multi-agent generation, meta-judge evaluation specification, multi-judge evaluation, and evidence-based synthesis | 100 | 62 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 35 | C | Execute tasks through systematic exploration, pruning, and expansion using Tree of Thoughts methodology with meta-judge evaluation specifications and multi-agent evaluation | 100 | 62 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 36 | C | Reflect on previus response and output, based on Self-refinement framework for iterative improvement with complexity triage and verification | 100 | 62 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 37 | C | Execute a task with sub-agent implementation and LLM-as-a-judge verification with automatic retry loop | 100 | 59 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 38 | C | Comprehensive A3 one-page problem analysis with root cause and action plan | 99 | 59 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 39 | C | Generate ideas in one shot using creative sampling | 100 | 58 | D | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 40 | C | Refine a draft task specification into a fully planned, implementation-ready task with acceptance criteria, architecture, per-step sub-task files and verifiable phases | 100 | 57 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 41 | C | implement-taskAnalyzerSoftware developmentData and analyticsNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Implement a task step by step with automated LLM-as-Judge verification at the end of each phase | 100 | 54 | C | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 42 | C | apply-anthropic-skill-best-practicesProcedureWordExcelAI and agentsNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Comprehensive guide for skill development based on Anthropic's official best practices - use for complex skills requiring detailed structure | 100 | 65 | F missing files | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 43 | C | attach-review-to-prIntegrationGitHubSoftware developmentNeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kitAgent Skills Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API | 100 | 63 | C missing files | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 44 | C | Create pull requests using GitHub CLI with proper templates and formatting | 100 | 63 | D missing files | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 45 | D | Update and maintain project documentation for local code changes using multi-agent workflow with tech-writer agents. Covers docs/, READMEs, JSDoc, and API documentation. | 100 | 43 | C missing files | — | — | 4 d ago | |
| 46 | D | Create and configure git hooks with intelligent project analysis, suggestions, and automated testing | 100 | 41 | C missing files | — | — | 4 d ago |