CF humanize
Detect and remove AI writing patterns from academic manuscripts and response-to-reviewers letters. Scans for 27 common AI-generated text patterns and rewrites flagged passages to sound naturally human-written while preserving technical accuracy, bounding how much of the text a rewrite is allowed to touch.
Detect and remove AI writing patterns from academic manuscripts and response-to-reviewers letters.
As a process F 45/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/check_rhetorical_density.py, scripts/check_paren_spans.py, references/r2r_voice.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/check_rhetorical_density.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/check_paren_spans.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/r2r_voice.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools"
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/check_rhetorical_density.py, scripts/check_paren_spans.py, references/r2r_voice.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 18 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4629 tokens
- 100Steps. 33 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 306: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 21 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.