SKILLEMALL.ai

BC surf

Use this skill — NOT browser or web_fetch — for ALL Surf crypto-data calls. 83 endpoints at localhost:8402/v1/surf/* covering CEX/DEX markets, on-chain SQL over 80+ ClickHouse tables (Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, BSC, TRON, HyperEVM, Tempo), 100M+ labeled wallets, prediction markets (Polymarket + Kalshi), social/CT intelligence, news, project + DeFi metrics, token analytics, unified search, VC fund intelligence. Paid through ClawRouter — x402 USDC from the local wallet, or BlockRun account credit if an API key is configured. No Surf account or Surf API key required either way.

BlockRunAI/ClawRouter Agent Skills author: BlockRunAI MIT 1 file body ≈ 3 715 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Use this skill — NOT browser or webfetch — for ALL Surf crypto-data calls.

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 39): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 6 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3715 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 580: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.