BC illustration-bold-pop
Draws hand-authored SVG spot illustrations in a bold pop-geometric style for design and coding scenes. Identifying traits: a thick navy outline on every shape, solid navy extrusions that always step down-right, saturated flat fills (hot pink, lemon, aqua, violet, mint, lime) textured with navy hatching and dots, and a dense overlapping cluster of chunky props (browser windows, pinwheel tiles, iso cubes, lightning bolts) around one slim cartoon character. Covers palette, line weights, extrusion and union-outline techniques, a JS helper for the repeated marks, characters and hands, composition and a render-and-critique loop. Use when someone asks for bold pop, pop geometric, retro pop, memphis-style, navy-outline, chunky outlined or loud colourful illustrations, or for empty states, onboarding, 404 or error pages, blog headers, feature spots and marketing cards in that look.
Draws hand-authored SVG spot illustrations in a bold pop-geometric style for design and coding scenes.
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Draws hand-authored SVG spot illustrations in a bold pop-geometric… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4835 tokens
- 100Steps. 72 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 885: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 72 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.