BD illustration-one-line
Draws original hand-written SVG spot illustrations in the One-line style, joyful action figures doing design and coding work. One continuous uniform black line (2.3 px at 480 wide) loops and doubles back to draw the whole figure. Flat coral, periwinkle and white patches sit behind the line, wobbly and deliberately knocked 2–6 px out of register like a misprinted riso. Tops carry coral stripe lines, and there is no ground plane, only a squiggle, a curl or a few speed strokes, all on warm beige paper. Covers the palette, a route-building toolkit (tube limbs, hand and shoe loops, wobble patches, masks), poses, composition and a render-critique loop. Use when asked for one-line, single-line, continuous-line, misregistered, riso-style or playful doodle illustrations, for empty states, onboarding, 404 pages, blog headers, feature spots, launch announcements or marketing cards.
Draws original hand-written SVG spot illustrations in the One-line style, joyful action figures doing design and coding work.
As a process D 36/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: examples/hackathon-sprint.svg, examples/flow-state.svg, examples/juggling-tasks.svg
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/hackathon-sprint.svg - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/flow-state.svg - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/juggling-tasks.svg
Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: examples/hackathon-sprint.svg, examples/flow-state.svg, examples/juggling-tasks.svg
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4729 tokens
- 100Steps. 70 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 883: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 70 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.