AC launching-evals
Run, monitor, analyze, and debug LLM evaluations via nemo-evaluator-launcher. Covers running evaluations, checking status and live progress, debugging failed runs, exporting artifacts and logs, and analyzing results. ALWAYS triggers on mentions of running evaluations, checking progress, debugging failed evals, analyzing or analysing runs or results, run directories or artifact paths on clusters, Slurm job issues, invocation IDs, or inspecting logs (client logs, server logs, SSH to cluster, tail logs, grep logs). Do NOT use for creating or modifying evaluation configs.
Run, monitor, analyze, and debug LLM evaluations via nemo-evaluator-launcher.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 14 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1298 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 574: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.