SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AA quant-recipe-search

Use when the user asks to find, search for, or optimize the best quantization recipe for a model, including direct requests like "find the best quantization recipe and generate a PTQ checkpoint." Guides the multi-candidate loop: choose compute-vs-memory success metrics, select ModelOpt recipe baselines, design AutoQuant/manual recipe deltas, interpret sensitivity, and decide next candidates. Do NOT use for a single known PTQ recipe run (use ptq), serving (use deployment), creating/running evals (use evaluation or launching-evals), monitoring jobs (use monitor), MLflow browsing (use accessing-mlflow), or comparing completed baseline-vs-candidate scores only (use compare-results).

NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer Agent Skills author: NVIDIA Apache-2.0 3 files body ≈ 2 028 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Use when the user asks to find, search for, or optimize the best quantization recipe for a model, including direct requests like "find the best quantization…

As a process A 81/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice

ProcedureInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
81/100
Runs to the end
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
40
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 81/100

    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 51 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2028 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 687: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
    • +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.