CC wiki
Make AI truly understand large codebases: for multi-repository, multi-microservice projects that have evolved over years, run architecture reverse-engineering + a Graph RAG graph + multi-language AST to compress a huge codebase into a structured knowledge base, where every conclusion traces back to a code line and every relation carries a confidence label. Suited to projects with 10+ repositories or microservices that AI cannot understand globally by reading the code directly. Triggers: architecture analysis, architecture reverse-engineering, codebase knowledge base, code-to-knowledge, architecture wiki, large multi-repo codebase. Loaded on demand by the teamai discovery stub.
Make AI truly understand large codebases: for multi-repository, multi-microservice projects that have evolved over years, run architecture reverse-engineering…
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: failures and branches, running it twice, progress reporting
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain invisible characters, encoded commands or comments hidden from readers but visible to the model. What you read differs from what the agent sees.
Remove invisible characters (they usually sneak in through copy-paste) and encoded strings: no catalog will pass them. Instructions for the model must be readable by a human too.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
-
high Obfuscation
uni-zero-widthreferences/methodology/phase2-document-types.md:289Zero-width / invisible characters (possible hidden text) (6 occurrences)␀```mermaid
Files scanned: 17. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 101): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4217 tokens
- 100Steps. 21 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (10 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 685: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.