CC osint-investigation
Sparse-clue OSINT investigation methodology for extracting overlooked leads, connecting fragmented evidence, and testing explanations across sources. Use for multi-step CTF challenges, image/video geolocation, event reconstruction, public-account and entity verification, artifact interpretation, infrastructure research, or stalled investigations.
Sparse-clue OSINT investigation methodology for extracting overlooked leads, connecting fragmented evidence, and testing explanations across sources.
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../research-ops/SKILL.md, ../deep-research/SKILL.md, ../exa-search/SKILL.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5561 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../research-ops/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../deep-research/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../exa-search/SKILL.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../security-review/SKILL.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../research-ops/SKILL.md, ../deep-research/SKILL.md, ../exa-search/SKILL.md
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5561 tokens
- 85Steps. 34 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 348: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.