SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF incident-response

Use when a security incident has been detected or declared and needs classification, triage, escalation path determination, and forensic evidence collection. Covers SEV1-SEV4 classification, false positive filtering, incident taxonomy, and NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle.

alirezarezvani/claude-skills Agent Skills author: alirezarezvani MIT 3 files body ≈ 3 758 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Covers SEV1-SEV4 classification, false positive filtering, incident taxonomy, and NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle.

As a process F 46/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../cloud-security/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
46/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../cloud-security/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 5

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 5
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:64
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    echo '{"event_type": "ransomware", "host": "prod-db-01", "raw_payload": {}}' | \
    quoted
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:72
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "event_type": "ransomware",
    quoted
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:99
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | ransomware | SEV1 | T1486 | 15 minutes |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:120
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | Ransomware note found | SEV1 |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:136
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | SEV1 | Critical | Confirmed ransomware; active PII/PHI exfiltration (>10K records); domain controller breach; defense evasion (CloudTrail disabled); supply chain compromise | All skills (parallel) |

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../threat-detection/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../cloud-security/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../red-team/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../security-pen-testing/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../cloud-security/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: ../threat-detection/SKILL.md, ../cloud-security/SKILL.md, ../red-team/SKILL.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 28 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3758 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 265: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.