SKILLEMALL.ai

AB learn-my-brand

Learn my brand once and stop asking me every time. Use when someone says learn my brand, set up my brand, here's our brand book, remember how we talk, what can we claim, can we say this, approve our claims, sign off our voice, our price or product changed, the client approved the claims, pick up where we left off, or check our claims are still current. Reads what GooseWorks already found about the brand, asks only the gaps as drafts to confirm, audits every claim (including ones research marked approved) and gets the ones that matter signed off with proof, scope and review date, turns the voice into rules the owner confirms, checks logo, colours and fonts, and saves it all as it goes so every other job loads it instead of asking. Ends with an unknowns list and a read-back. Not for who our customers are and what they say (use research-audience) or writing positioning from scratch (not covered yet).

athina-ai/goose-skills Agent Skills author: athina-ai 12 files body ≈ 3 450 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Learn my brand once and stop asking me every time.

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: learn-my-brand (gooseworks-ai/goose-skills)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1

    ✓ Guard found no suspicious behaviour. 1 matches are attack strings quoted in this security skill's own documentation.

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, read) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 33 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3450 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Description length 910: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 6)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.