BC quality-manager-qms-iso13485
ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support.
ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations.
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../quality-manager-qmr/, ../capa-officer/, ../qms-audit-expert/
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/advanced-integration.md:262Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)→ Penetration testing to verify fix
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../quality-manager-qmr/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../capa-officer/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../qms-audit-expert/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../quality-documentation-manager/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../risk-management-specialist/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../fda-consultant-specialist/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../regulatory-affairs-head/
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: ../quality-manager-qmr/, ../capa-officer/, ../qms-audit-expert/
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 100Steps. 35 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1713 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 207: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.