SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD implement

Change or repair code, config or services without weakening tests; report what ran and what did not. Use when: implementing a change or fixing a defect.

boshu2/agentops Agent Skills author: boshu2 5 files body ≈ 2 868 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Change or repair code, config or services without weakening tests; report what ran and what did not.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../test/SKILL.md, ../test/references/error-recovery.md, ../rpi/references/boundaries.md

ProcedureSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../test/SKILL.md, ../test/references/error-recovery.md, ../rpi/references/boundaries.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: implement (boshu2/agentops)

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell references/scaffold/agent-facing-tool-scaffolds.md:12
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    - Avoid `curl | sh` in generated docs unless the repo explicitly accepts it.
    quoted

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../test/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../test/references/error-recovery.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../rpi/references/boundaries.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../agent-native/references/session-associations.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../agent-native/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../using-gc/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../rpi/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../validate/SKILL.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "practices"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "hexagonal_role"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "consumes"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "produces"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "output_contract"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "context_rel"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "skill_api_version"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 26, 27): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../test/SKILL.md, ../test/references/error-recovery.md, ../rpi/references/boundaries.md
  • 0Tools and files. 8 referenced file(s) missing: ../test/SKILL.md, ../test/references/error-recovery.md, ../rpi/references/boundaries.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2868 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 152: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.