SKILLEMALL.ai

AB linkedin-jobs-search

Search LinkedIn job listings and extract full job details. Supports filtering by work type (remote/on-site/hybrid), contract type (full-time/part-time/contract/internship), experience level, date posted, and company. Returns job title, company, location, work type, contract type, experience level, posted date, applicant count, job description, salary, and direct job URLs. Use when user mentions linkedin jobs, linkedin job search, scrape linkedin jobs, extract linkedin job listings, find jobs on linkedin, job openings, job postings linkedin, linkedin career search, job hunting linkedin, linkedin vacancy, jobs remote linkedin, work from home jobs linkedin, linkedin scraper jobs, linkedin job data, linkedin hiring, collect job leads linkedin.

browser-act/skills Agent Skills author: browser-act MIT 3 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 2 281 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Search LinkedIn job listings and extract full job details.

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

IntegrationPeople and hiringtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2281 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 749: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.