SKILLEMALL.ai

AB opentangl

Not a code generator — an entire dev team. You write the vision, it ships the code. Autonomous builds, PRs, reviews, and merges across multiple repos. Point it at any JS/TS project and a product vision. It plans features, writes code, verifies builds, creates PRs, reviews diffs, and merges — autonomously. Manages multiple repos as one product. Use when you want to ship code without writing it. AI code generation, autonomous development, workflow automation, multi-repo orchestration, TypeScript, JavaScript, GitHub, OpenAI, Anthropic, Claude, GPT, LLM, devtools, CI/CD, pull requests, code review.

ClawHub Hermes author: 8co v0.1.10 2 files body ≈ 1 888 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

GeneratorGitHubSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 601 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 28 steps
  • 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1888 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 601: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
OpenTangl is openly an autonomous development setup skill, but it can lead to code changes and GitHub merges using the user's account, so it should be reviewed carefully before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026