BD weekly-report
自动整理周报工具。支持从多个数据源（GitHub、飞书文档、日历）汇总工作内容，生成Markdown周报。支持保存历史、AI摘要、导出PDF/HTML、发送邮件、写入飞书文档。适用于需要定期总结工作成果的用户。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
ReferenceGitHubData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (weekly-report) differs from the folder (weekly-report-ai)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 537 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 105: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill broadly does what it claims, but it needs review because it handles work-account credentials, can send or publish report content, and has weak guardrails around local file writes and deletion.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026