SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF pet-food-compare

用于公正、中立地对比线上在售的狗粮、猫粮产品信息。当用户正在挑选、对比、纠结于几款狗粮或猫粮，给出产品名、商品链接或包装图，希望查证成分、价格、产地、营养指标、代工厂等信息，或希望生成对比表时，必须使用本 skill。典型触发场景包括"帮我看看这两款猫粮"、"XX 和 YY 比怎么样"、"这几个狗粮给我对比一下"、"我发了几个链接，你帮我查一下"。本 skill 只做中立信息收集、归纳与对比，绝不替用户做推荐决策。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: chenchen91 v0.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 904 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

用于公正、中立地对比线上在售的狗粮、猫粮产品信息。当用户正在挑选、对比、纠结于几款狗粮或猫粮，给出产品名、商品链接或包装图，希望查证成分、价格、产地、营养指标、代工厂等信息，或希望生成对比表时，必须使用本 skill。典型触发场景包括"帮我看看这两款猫粮"、"XX 和 YY…

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: 图片URL, url

ProcedureCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: 图片URL, url
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: pet-food-compare (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: 图片URL
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: url

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: 图片URL, url
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: 图片URL, url
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pet-food-compare) differs from the folder (pet-food-compare-2)
  • 100Steps. 144 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2904 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 209: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 144 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a single-file pet food comparison skill that asks the agent to gather public product information and present neutral, sourced tables, with no executable install or persistence behavior found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026