SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC todo-list

📝 TODO 清单管理（个人跨会话） TRIGGER when 用户用自然语言表达任务/提醒/查询意图： - "提醒我..."、"加个待办..."、"完成..."、"删除..." - "我的待办"、"今天有什么"、"show todos"、"todos" - 触发词完整列表见 references/triggers.md DO NOT TRIGGER when： - 团队协作场景（多用户/分配/审批）→ 用 project-mgmt - 日历同步需求（Google Calendar / Outlook）→ 用 calendar - 项目管理（看板/甘特图）→ 用 project-mgmt - 长篇笔记/文档（>2000 字符）→ 用 note 适用于个人跨会话 TODO 清单，支持自然语言添加、优先级、标签、定时推送（钉钉）。 完整命令参考 references/commands.md。

Not recommendedcritical or high security findings
ClawHub Agent Skills author: Jeff Chen v1.5.0 MIT-0 37 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 2 999 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 33 h ago

📝 TODO 清单管理（个人跨会话） TRIGGER when 用户用自然语言表达任务/提醒/查询意图： - "提醒我..."、"加个待办..."、"完成..."、"删除..." - "我的待办"、"今天有什么"、"show todos"、"todos" - 触发词完整列表见…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ReferenceOutlookPersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
79
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.

Dangerous commands
If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

  1. Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 4

  • high Dangerous commands cmd-persistence scripts/cron_setup.sh:20
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry)
    (crontab -l 2>/dev/null | grep -v "src.reminder"; echo "$CRON_DAILY_DUE"; echo "$CRON_CHECK_OVERDUE"; echo "$CRON_ARCHIVE") | crontab -
Medium and low: 3
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention scripts/cron_setup.sh:20
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    (crontab -l 2>/dev/null | grep -v "src.reminder"; echo "$CRON_DAILY_DUE"; echo "$CRON_CHECK_OVERDUE"; echo "$CRON_ARCHIVE") | crontab -
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention scripts/cron_setup.sh:27
    Mentions editing / listing crontab (string literal in code, not executed)
    echo "查看：crontab -l"
    code literal
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention scripts/cron_setup.sh:28
    Mentions editing / listing crontab (string literal in code, not executed)
    echo "移除：crontab -e（删除含 src.reminder 的行）"
    code literal

Files scanned: 32. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (todo-list) differs from the folder (todo-list-skill)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2999 tokens
  • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • -33 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 400: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 41 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a real TODO/reminder skill, but it asks for persistent scheduling, external notifications, and broad natural-language authority without enough user-control safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 11 Jun 2026