SKILLEMALL.ai

AC jobs-to-be-done

Activate when: user says 'customers aren't switching to us even though we're better,' 'our churn surveys aren't predicting who actually leaves,' 'we're debating features instead of what the customer actually needs,' 'who is our real customer,' or mentions 'JTBD / jobs to be done / what are they hiring this for.' Do NOT activate when: product is a commodity with no job-level differentiation (electricity, raw materials); purchase is driven entirely by regulatory/legal compliance with no real customer choice. More: deciqai.com/c/jobs-to-be-done

ClawHub Agent Skills author: deciqAI v1.0.5 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 932 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Activate when: user says 'customers aren't switching to us even though we're better,' 'our churn surveys aren't predicting who actually leaves,' 'we're…

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice

ProcedurePeople and hiringSecurityOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
95
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1932 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 547: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a markdown-only product strategy coaching skill with no executable behavior or unusual access requests.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 17 Jul 2026