SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD visual-interactive-courseware

可视化交互课件制作技能。当用户需要为课堂教学制作可视化、可交互的课件（HTML 单文件）时使用。触发场景：把教材知识点（如血液循环、四羊方尊、晨昏线、二分二至等）做成 SVG 演示 + 可交互的网页课件、知识卡和教师说明。适用学科：生物、历史、地理、物理、化学、数学等一切含结构、流程、现象的知识点。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Eric JIE v1.2.2 MIT-0 11 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 857 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 5 d ago

可视化交互课件制作技能。当用户需要为课堂教学制作可视化、可交互的课件（HTML 单文件）时使用。触发场景：把教材知识点（如血液循环、四羊方尊、晨昏线、二分二至等）做成 SVG 演示 + 可交互的网页课件、知识卡和教师说明。适用学科：生物、历史、地理、物理、化学、数学等一切含结构、流程、现象的知识点。

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureBlenderLearningtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "title"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 62 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1857 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 150: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 62 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches a courseware-building purpose, but it includes watermark-removal guidance and optional local tool, credential, and external asset workflows that deserve review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 29 Sept 2026