SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC qlik-cloud

Complete Qlik Cloud analytics platform integration with 37 tools. Health checks, search, app management, reloads, natural language queries (Insight Advisor), automations, AutoML, Qlik Answers AI, data alerts, spaces, users, licenses, data files, and lineage. Use when user asks about Qlik, Qlik Cloud, Qlik Sense apps, analytics dashboards, data reloads, or wants to query business data using natural language.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: fianabates1 v1.0.0 40 files · 37 scripts body ≈ 2 083 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency

IntegrationData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: qlik-cloud (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 40. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (qlik-cloud) differs from the folder (qlik)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 19 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2083 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 410: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
    • +3All 37 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This Qlik Cloud skill mostly matches its stated purpose, but it needs review because its scripts can expose the API key or run unintended local code if inputs or tenant settings are unsafe.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026