SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC wavespeed

Generate or edit AI media (image, video, audio, 3D) by calling the wavespeed CLI on the user's machine. Use whenever the user asks to create, edit, animate, upscale, or transform a visual asset, generate audio/TTS/music, or produce marketing creatives. Every model on the WaveSpeed platform is one `wavespeed run <id>` call.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Johnson v0.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 084 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Generate or edit AI media (image, video, audio, 3D) by calling the wavespeed CLI on the user's machine.

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

GeneratorMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: wavespeed (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (wavespeed) differs from the folder (wavespeed-2)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 11 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2084 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 324: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is coherent for WaveSpeed media generation, but it asks users to run an unpinned CLI and may expose API keys through chat and command-line use.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 9 Sept 2026