BF freelance-job-scraper
Autonomous freelance job monitoring agent. Scans Hacker News Who is Hiring, YC jobs board, and remote job aggregators for high-value automation and AI gigs, scores them by relevance and payout, and flags actionable leads.
As a process F 52/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/hn_jobs_guide.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/hn_jobs_guide.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/hn_jobs_guide.md
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/hn_jobs_guide.md
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 390 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 221: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill looks like a simple job-report script, but it materially overstates what it scans and uses the user's authenticated GitHub CLI session for a mismatched data source.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026