SKILLEMALL.ai

AC competitive-radar

Tracks competitors weekly across 6 signals: pricing page diffs, homepage positioning changes, blog/RSS posts, job postings (hiring as strategy signal), GitHub star velocity and releases, and daily critical-change alerts for pricing or funding keywords. Delivers a structured digest to Slack, Telegram, WhatsApp, or Discord every Monday. Fires same-day alerts for critical changes. Use when asked to "add competitor", "track competitor", "competitor digest", "what changed at [company]", "competitor report", "monitor [company]", "who is [company] hiring", "did [company] change pricing".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: manjotpahwa v1.1.0 MIT-0 13 files body ≈ 1 632 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubSlackDiscordTelegramPeople and hiringInfrastructureMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url README.md:51
      Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (placeholder value)
      export DISCORD_WEBHOOK_URL="https://discord.com/api/webhooks/..."
      placeholder
    • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url scripts/deliver.py:170
      Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      url = f"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}/sendMessage"
      vendor-hostquoted

    Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "emoji"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
    • 100Steps. 51 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1632 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (13 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 8 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 587: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 51 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +3All 8 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This competitor-monitoring skill mostly matches its purpose, but it needs review because it ships with active preset targets, stores license identity data, persists monitoring history, and sends digests through third-party channels.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026