SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF x-research

X/Twitter research skill powered by TwitterAPI.io. Agentic search, profile analysis, thread reading, watchlists, and sourced briefings. Use when asked to search X/Twitter, check what people are saying about a topic, monitor accounts, or research crypto/tech narratives on X.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: minilozio v1.0.1 9 files body ≈ 1 913 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 36/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: url

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
36/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: url
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: url

Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: url
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: url
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (x-research) differs from the folder (x-research-but-cheaper)
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 38 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1913 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 274: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This appears to be a coherent read-only X/Twitter research tool, with normal cautions around its API key, provider calls, local caching, and npx-based runner.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 19 May 2026