SKILLEMALL.ai

BF pm-review

PM PRD 评审 skill。PRD v1.0 产出后,引导 PM 组织三端(服务端/客户端/测试)+ 设计 review 并行,通过 5 轮迭代拿到可 coding 的 v3.x 终稿。触发场景:用户说"组织 review"、"PRD 评审"、"三端对齐"、或 workflow-start 路由到此 skill。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: X和小克 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 241 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

PM PRD 评审 skill。PRD v1.0 产出后,引导 PM 组织三端(服务端/客户端/测试)+ 设计 review 并行,通过 5 轮迭代拿到可 coding 的 v3.x 终稿。触发场景:用户说"组织 review"、"PRD 评审"、"三端对齐"、或 workflow-start 路由到此 skill。

As a process F 36/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../templates/prd-template.md, ../../lessons/by-role/pm.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
36/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../../templates/prd-template.md, ../../lessons/by-role/pm.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../templates/prd-template.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../lessons/by-role/pm.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../templates/prd-template.md, ../../lessons/by-role/pm.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../../templates/prd-template.md, ../../lessons/by-role/pm.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pm-review) differs from the folder (workflow-dlc-pm-review)
  • 100Steps. 48 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1241 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -225 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 159: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a non-executable PRD review workflow skill with no evidence of hidden data access, persistence, or unsafe actions.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 17 Jun 2026