SKILLEMALL.ai

BF patent-writer

中文专利交底书撰写助手。支持两种模式:(1) 方向模式:用户给出技术方向,自动搜索并推荐创新点供选择;(2) 明确想法模式:用户已有明确发明构思,直接进入撰写流程。触发词:写专利、专利撰写、专利交底书、发明点推荐、帮我写个专利。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: xwZhang v1.1.0 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 835 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

中文专利交底书撰写助手。支持两种模式:(1) 方向模式:用户给出技术方向,自动搜索并推荐创新点供选择;(2) 明确想法模式:用户已有明确发明构思,直接进入撰写流程。触发词:写专利、专利撰写、专利交底书、发明点推荐、帮我写个专利。

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/template.md, references/writing-guide.md, references/architecture-guide.md

GeneratorWordWriting and documentsResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
57
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/template.md, references/writing-guide.md, references/architecture-guide.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/template.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/writing-guide.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/architecture-guide.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/proposal-summary-template.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/template.md, references/writing-guide.md, references/architecture-guide.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: references/template.md, references/writing-guide.md, references/architecture-guide.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 50 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 835 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 114: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 50 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This patent-writing skill is mostly purpose-aligned, but its DOCX conversion script can execute unintended shell commands if given a crafted filename or output path.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Sept 2026