SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB wiki-lint

Lint and health-check a persistent markdown knowledge wiki. Use when a user wants the agent to inspect a wiki for contradictions, stale claims, missing cross-links, orphan pages, duplicate pages, inconsistent naming, inconsistent frontmatter, schema drift, weak source attribution, or other maintenance issues. Best for Obsidian-friendly, plain markdown, or git-backed wikis that are maintained over time and need periodic cleanup or structural review.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: teki-ai v0.1.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 409 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerObsidianSoftware developmentInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Failures and branches w 10
55
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 23 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 409 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 452: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a markdown-only wiki linting skill that reviews and, when asked, can help fix wiki organization issues without hidden code, credential use, network activity, or persistence.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026