AC adhd-assistant
ADHD-friendly life management assistant for SkillBoss API Hub. Helps with daily planning, task breakdown, time management, prioritization, body doubling, dopamine regulation, and maintaining routines. Use when the user asks for help organizing their life, staying on top of tasks, beating procrastination, planning their day/week, managing overwhelm, or mentions ADHD-related challenges like time blindness, forgetfulness, difficulty starting tasks, or emotional dysregulation.
As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
The same skill appears in 2 more places: ClawHub, ClawHub
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (adhd-assistant) differs from the folder (adhder-assistant)
- 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 218 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3322 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 477: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 41 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 218 items
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.