BD crypto-whale-monitor
Monitors large cryptocurrency wallet balances (whales) on-chain using Web3 RPC to detect potential market-moving activity. Can read from `references/wallets.md` or accept custom addresses.
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/wallets.md:6High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)- 0x47…50: Whale 1 - Known large institutional holder (>$100M)
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/wallets.md:7High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)- 0x9f…2A: Whale 2 - Large exchange/custodian deposit wallet (potential market impact)
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/wallets.md:8High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)- 0x6e…d6: Whale 3 - Early Bitcoin/Ethereum investor
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/monitor.js:50High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)'0xBE…3E8', // Binance 7
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/monitor.js:51High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)'0xAb…C9B' // Vitalik Buterin
quoted
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 174 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 188: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 4 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This skill does what it says: it checks listed Ethereum wallet balances through a public RPC endpoint and prints alerts, with no hidden install hooks or destructive behavior found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026