SKILLEMALL.ai

AD skill-factory

Build and publish OpenClaw skills from recurring pain points. Scans .learnings/ for errors that hit 3+ recurrences, scaffolds skills from them, and publishes to ClawHub. Use when: (1) you want to create a new skill from a pain point, (2) you want to check if any recurring errors are ready for extraction, (3) you want to package and publish a skill in one step, (4) you want to automate the pain-to-skill pipeline. The thing that builds the thing.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: wrentheai v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 700 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (skill-factory) differs from the folder (wren-skill-factory)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 700 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 448: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill does what it says, but its one-step publish command can upload local skill contents under an authenticated account and uses unsafe shell command construction.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026