SKILLEMALL.ai

AD deep-research

Deep web research with multi-round search, cross-verification, and structured reports with citations. Enhances web_search and web_fetch into a full research workflow. Use when: user asks to research a topic in depth, investigate something thoroughly, compare options with evidence, write a research report, or needs more than a simple search answer. Trigger phrases: "research", "deep dive", "investigate", "调研", "深度搜索", "帮我研究", "详细了解一下", "对比分析", "compare X vs Y", "what are the pros and cons of", "综合分析". NOT for: simple factual lookups ("what's the capital of France"), real-time data (stock prices, live scores), or browsing/interacting with a specific website (use browser).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Wen v2.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 132 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

AnalyzerData and analyticsResearchInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
96
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (deep-research) differs from the folder (research-dive)
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 37 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1132 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 678: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 18 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a disclosed deep-research helper that runs a local Python script, uses web search/fetch workflows, and saves research reports without evidence of hidden or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026