CD self-improving-agent
AI自我改进与记忆系统 - 解决'同类错误反复犯、用户纠正不长记性'的痛点。自动捕获错误、用户纠正、最佳实践，并转化为长期记忆。
AI自我改进与记忆系统 - 解决'同类错误反复犯、用户纠正不长记性'的痛点。自动捕获错误、用户纠正、最佳实践，并转化为长期记忆。
As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
The same skill appears in 2 more places: ClawHub, ClawHub
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (self-improving-agent) differs from the folder (self-improving-agent-cn)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 645 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 64: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -222 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.
In the sandbox Скрипты не запустились
The skill's scripts were run in a throwaway machine: no network, fake keys in the home directory, a tracer watching. We wrote down what they did. Reaching for the network or for secrets caps the technical grade at C; a quiet run adds no points.
Запущено 4 скрипта; каждому дали двадцать секунд, поддельный домашний каталог с ключами и сеть, в которой ничего нет.
Ни один не дошёл до работы — им не хватило зависимостей, аргументов или файлов. Это не отзыв о поведении: наблюдать было не за чем.
check_memory.py | не запустился: Usage: check_memory.py --command 'cmd' |
log_best_practice.py | не запустился: log_best_practice.py: error: the following arguments are required: --category, --practice |
log_correction.py | не запустился: log_correction.py: error: the following arguments are required: --topic, --wrong, --correct |
log_error.py | не запустился: Usage: log_error.py --command 'cmd' --error 'err' [--fix 'solution'] |
26 Sept 2026