CF humanize-korean
AI(ChatGPT·Claude·Gemini)가 쓴 한글 텍스트를 사람이 쓴 글처럼 윤문한다. 번역투·영어 인용 과다·기계적 병렬·관용구·피동 남용·접속사 남발·리듬 균일·이모지/불릿 과다 등 10대 카테고리 85개 AI 티 패턴을 탐지·분류해 내용은 한 글자도 건드리지 않고 문체·리듬·표현만 자연스럽게 재작성한다. 트리거 — "AI 티 없애줘", "AI 윤문", "ChatGPT 티 제거", "번역투 고쳐", "사람이 쓴 것처럼", "humanize Korean". 단순 맞춤법 교정·번역·내용 추가는 대상 아님.
AI(ChatGPT·Claude·Gemini)가 쓴 한글 텍스트를 사람이 쓴 글처럼 윤문한다.
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/quick-rules.md, references/ai-tell-taxonomy.md, references/rewriting-playbook.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/quick-rules.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/ai-tell-taxonomy.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/rewriting-playbook.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/quick-rules.md, references/ai-tell-taxonomy.md, references/rewriting-playbook.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 577 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 289: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.