CD hyperframes-cli
Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, timeline, history, clean, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.
Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats…
As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../hyperframes/references/plugin-installation.md, references/creator-editing-recipes.md, references/variables-and-media.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 6332 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../hyperframes/references/plugin-installation.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/creator-editing-recipes.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/variables-and-media.md - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 182): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../hyperframes/references/plugin-installation.md, references/creator-editing-recipes.md, references/variables-and-media.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 20 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6332 tokens
- 100Steps. 37 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (13 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 576: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.