CC intake-wizard
Generate or complete intake forms (project-intake, solution-profile, option-matrix) with interactive questioning and optional guidance. INTENDED FOR SUBSTANTIAL NEW WORK — new addons, new frameworks, new tracks, refactors crossing module boundaries — not every feature request. Apply the `sdlc-right-sizing` rule first to determine whether intake is appropriate; most day-to-day features need only an issue and possibly an ADR.
Generate or complete intake forms (project-intake, solution-profile, option-matrix) with interactive questioning and optional guidance.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — References files that are not bundled: ../../../addons/aiwg-utils/rules/skill-discovery.md, ../../../addons/aiwg-utils/rules/sdlc-right-sizing.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:489Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Enterprise**: Full SDL, penetration testing, IR playbooks, SOC2/ISO27001
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:638Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Enterprise**: Enterprise (full SDL, penetration testing, compliance controls, SOC2/ISO27001, IR playbooks)
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:699Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Enterprise**: All Production gates + penetration testing, compliance scan, performance benchmarks
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:741Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Production → Enterprise**: Compliance controls, penetration testing, disaster recovery plan
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:925Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- {[x] if applicable} Security requirements (penetration testing, audits)
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 18139 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../addons/aiwg-utils/rules/skill-discovery.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../addons/aiwg-utils/rules/sdlc-right-sizing.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "namespace" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "commandHint" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 93, 853): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../addons/aiwg-utils/rules/skill-discovery.md, ../../../addons/aiwg-utils/rules/sdlc-right-sizing.md
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 18139 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Steps. 263 steps, 4 vague phrases
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Failures and branches. 21 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 427: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 58 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 263 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (39 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.