AC memory-pipeline
Complete agent memory + performance system. Extracts structured facts, builds knowledge graphs, generates briefings, and enforces execution discipline via pre-game routines, tool policies, result compression, and after-action reviews. Includes external knowledge ingestion (ChatGPT exports, etc.) into searchable memory. Use when working on memory management, briefing generation, knowledge consolidation, external data ingestion, agent consistency, or improving execution quality across sessions.
Complete agent memory + performance system.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 31 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2148 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 497: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 5 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.